Oh Obviously: Difference Between “Organic” and “Local”

If you are slightly confused about what the difference is between “organic” and “local”, you are not alone.

In a recent study of U.S. and Canmiessence-aff-250adian consumers, which was just published in the International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, it was reported:

– 17% of people believe that foods labeled as “organic” were also grown locally. 

– 23% of people believe that local produce is grown organically.

– 40% of consumers think “organic” food is more nutritious than conventional food.

Can organic food be grown locally? Yes.

Can local food be grown organically? Yes.

By definition, however, organic is not local, and local is not organic. They are two completely separate things.

Yet, the fact that approximately 1 out of 5 people is still confused about the meaning of organic vs. local is quite disconcerting.

Organic has USDA-approved rules, certification, and enforcement while “local” has none of those.

What does “local” mean? For the most part, it is whatever a restaurant, farmer, or market wants it to be.

While a copy of the 2008 Farm Bill says that “local” is within 400 miles, I don’t think anyone would consider an apple grown in the suburbs of Boston, but sold at a Washington, D.C. farmers market, to be “local”.  A more generally accepted number of “local” is 100 or 150 miles.

Two possible explanations for the results of this study are the following:

1) In general, people are still very confused about food labels.  After all, many consumers believe that natural is better than organic, which could not be further from the truth.

2) “Local” has become synonymous with sustainability in the culinary world. So, if a farm-to-table restaurant is serving local food, a lot of consumers probably think that it is organic as well and have come to regard the two terms as the same thing.

Now, the statistic of 40% of consumers believing that “organic” food is more nutritious than conventional food is what truly alarms me. Why?

It means 60% of consumers, a majority of people, think that conventionally-grown food is better than organic.

As pointed out in a recent meta-analysis of 343 previous peer-reviewed publications, organic food provides superior nutrition than conventionally-grown food.

And who can honestly say that food that is sprayed with super-toxic chemicals, such as 2,4-D, the primary ingredient in Agent Orange, is better for you than organic?

View this article and more at ->>Living Maxwell http://livingmaxwell.com/

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Top Foods To Buy Organic

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Organic Food Benefits Documented By Major Study

Recently the largest study of its kind found what many of us had already known, that organic foods and crops have significant advantages over their conventional counterparts, including more beneficial antioxidants and less frequent pesticide residues.

gardeningThe unprecedented study looked at  more than 340 peer-reviewed publications comparing the nutritional quality and safety of organic and conventional plant-based foods, including fruits, vegetables, and grains. The study team used sophisticated meta-analysis techniques to qualify differences between organic and non-organic foods.

“Science marches on,” said Charles Benbrook, a Washington State University researcher and the lone American co-author of the paper, published in theBritish Journal of Nutrition. “Our team learned valuable lessons from earlier reviews on this topic, and we benefited from the team’s remarkable breadth of scientific skills and experience.”

Most of the publications covered in the study looked at crops grown in the same area, on similar soils. This approach reduces other possible sources of variation in nutritional and safety parameters.

Further Reading ->> http://www.sciencedaily.com/…/../../140711153329.htm

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail